|
|
| Record Number | 3236 |
| Reference Type | Journal Article |
| Author(s) | Nakanishi, J.;Cory, R.;Mistry, M.;Peters, J.;Schaal, S. |
| Year | 2008 |
| Title | Operational space control: A theoretical and emprical comparison |
| Journal/Conference/Book Title | International Journal of Robotics Research |
| Keywords | task space control, operational space control, redundancy resolution, humanoid robotics |
Abstract |
Dexterous manipulation with a highly redundant movement system is one of the hallmarks of hu-
man motor skills. From numerous behavioral studies, there is strong evidence that humans employ
compliant task space control, i.e., they focus control only on task variables while keeping redundant
degrees-of-freedom as compliant as possible. This strategy is robust towards unknown disturbances
and simultaneously safe for the operator and the environment. The theory of operational space con-
trol in robotics aims to achieve similar performance properties. However, despite various compelling
theoretical lines of research, advanced operational space control is hardly found in actual robotics imple-
mentations, in particular new kinds of robots like humanoids and service robots, which would strongly
profit from compliant dexterous manipulation. To analyze the pros and cons of different approaches
to operational space control, this paper focuses on a theoretical and empirical evaluation of different
methods that have been suggested in the literature, but also some new variants of operational space
controllers. We address formulations at the velocity, acceleration and force levels. First, we formulate
all controllers in a common notational framework, including quaternion-based orientation control, and
discuss some of their theoretical properties. Second, we present experimental comparisons of these
approaches on a seven-degree-of-freedom anthropomorphic robot arm with several benchmark tasks.
As an aside, we also introduce a novel parameter estimation algorithm for rigid body dynamics, which
ensures physical consistency, as this issue was crucial for our successful robot implementations. Our
extensive empirical results demonstrate that one of the simplified acceleration-based approaches can
be advantageous in terms of task performance, ease of parameter tuning, and general robustness and
compliance in face of inevitable modeling errors.
|
| Notes | clmc |
| URL(s) | http://www-clmc.usc.edu/publications/N/nakanishi-IJRR2008.pdf
|
| Volume | 27 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 737-757 |
| Short Title | Operational space control: A theoretical and emprical comparison |
| Papers are available as Adobe PDF ".pdf" files. Adobe Reader is available for free for all computer platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
Page last modified on August 10, 2006, at 06:47 PM
|
|
